<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why does Chinese have more collective nouns than English?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.digmandarin.com/why-does-chinese-have-more-collective-nouns-than-english.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.digmandarin.com/why-does-chinese-have-more-collective-nouns-than-english.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 02:18:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: nomen nescio		</title>
		<link>https://www.digmandarin.com/why-does-chinese-have-more-collective-nouns-than-english.html#comment-33360</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nomen nescio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 02:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digmandarin.com/?p=6818#comment-33360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s not what collective noun means. In English a collecitve noun is one that expresses a plural meaning without a plural form. Coffee. Tea. Fish. Meat. These are all collective nouns.

What you are talking about is lexical space. It doesn&#039;t have any deep meaning. Of course it is going to be very different between two language that didn&#039;t have much contact until maybe the 18th or 19th century and which don&#039;t have areal contact at all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not what collective noun means. In English a collecitve noun is one that expresses a plural meaning without a plural form. Coffee. Tea. Fish. Meat. These are all collective nouns.</p>
<p>What you are talking about is lexical space. It doesn&#8217;t have any deep meaning. Of course it is going to be very different between two language that didn&#8217;t have much contact until maybe the 18th or 19th century and which don&#8217;t have areal contact at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
